Our aim is to provide social security actuaries and other interested experts with a coherent and adaptable method to manage the risks that pension systems inherently entail.
While all enterprises and institutions have governance and organisational structures, what sets pension systems apart is their individual mission and approach to fulfilling it. Based on these unique characteristics, we have defined a new approach for the main risk categories for all organisations as governance and organizational structures, own specific business, and operations of these organisations. The general ERM approach has served as the common starting point in finding the similarities and differences between pensions and other financial institutions: their processes and methods are similar, but the objectives differ.
Pension funds as financial institutions trade in risk and money, collecting contributions, and paying out pension benefits. A multi-pillar system is an old-age risk management tool as it is. In a three-pillar pension system, the pillars are usually defined by their adequacy objectives and risk appetite of the targeted socio-economic group. By including affordability and robustness in the definition, we have arrived at the core concept of the COSO risk framework with appetite/tolerance and performance/target coordinates. This strategic integration not only enhances our understanding but also facilitates the systematic development of a Risk Management Framework tailored to social security pension systems.
Establishing a Risk Management Function and a regular Own Risk Assessment reporting framework would be beneficial for Social Security Administrators. Actuarial reviews of the financial health of social systems are contributing to risk monitoring and risk mitigation. A holistic approach to risk management will ultimately result in better government and improved benefits for social security systems.